Part 3/Chapter 14/19-min read

Open Vascular Exposure and Reconstruction Principles

Principles of open vascular exposure and reconstruction across territories: inflow, outflow, clamp site, conduit, anastomosis, and bailout planned before incision. The chapter frames open operative judgment for elective, revisional, and EVAR-to-open settings where complex anatomy is the rule.

Edited by Tal M. Hörer MD, PhD · David T. McGreevy MD, PhD·Reviewed ·4 sections · 35 references

Listen to this chapter10 min · AI audio edition · two hostsAI narration

Planning conference: A practical planning-room conversation: anatomy, device or operative choices, surveillance, complications, and decision boundaries.

Choose the hosts

Exposure frame before procedure detail

Open vascular reconstruction begins with an exposure plan, not with the first clamp. The operative plan should define the inflow vessel, outflow vessel, anticipated clamp site, reconstruction target, bailout target, and monitoring adjuncts before incision. In contemporary practice, this planning is especially important because open operations are increasingly performed in patients with complex anatomy, prior endovascular treatment, or revisional fields; EVAR-to-open abdominal aortic conversion and thoracic endograft explantation both add physiologic stress and technical complexity beyond de-novo open reconstruction.

TreatmentDecision boundaries for open vascular reconstruction
  • Choose retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach based on anatomical access, prior surgery, and clinical context; neither approach is definitively superior in mortality.
    Trigger
    Adults undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Branch / Endpoint
    Evidence quality comparing the two approaches is low; individual surgeon experience and institutional practice should also inform approach selection.
    Citation
  • Multimodal spinal cord protection during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair combines cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, mild hypothermia, selective intercostal reattachment, and tight blood pressure management; postoperative protection extends those measures with perfusion-pressure maintenance, adequate hemoglobin, and early recognition of delayed paraplegia.
    Trigger
    Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with spinal cord ischemia risk.
    Branch / Endpoint
    —
    Citation
  • Treat the choice between routine and selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy as an evidence-limited surgeon/center-level decision; do not over-claim certainty for either policy, and do not promote any single intraoperative monitoring modality as definitively superior.
    Trigger
    Adults undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
    Branch / Endpoint
    All primary comparisons are graded low-quality; effect estimates derive from small trials with wide confidence intervals; the review explicitly calls for larger randomized trials before routine policy is changed.
    Citation
  • When planning open infrainguinal reconstruction for CLTI, treat single-segment autologous vein as the default conduit, reserve non-autologous conduit for situations where neither endovascular option nor adequate vein is available, and place the bypass-versus-endovascular decision inside the PLAN framework rather than on conduit habit alone.
    Trigger
    Adults with chronic limb-threatening ischemia eligible for revascularization.
    Branch / Endpoint
    WIfI is endorsed for limb-threat staging and GLASS is introduced for anatomic complexity scoring; specific GVG recommendation grades carry their own evidence-quality labels and should be interpreted within the document's full PLAN framework rather than as isolated rules.
    Citation

Exposure should be selected to create safe proximal and distal control before irreversible steps are taken. For elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches have not shown a perioperative mortality difference in systematic review, so the incision should be chosen around aneurysm extent, neck control, iliac access, prior abdominal surgery, pulmonary reserve, renal or visceral adjunct needs, and surgeon familiarity rather than a presumed universal superiority of one route.

Thoracoabdominal exposure requires a separate organ-protection frame. The surgeon should anticipate spinal cord, renal, visceral, pulmonary, and bleeding risks as exposure risks, not only reconstruction risks. Multimodal spinal cord protection during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair combines cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left-heart bypass, mild hypothermia, selective intercostal reconstruction, and strict blood-pressure management; postoperative protection remains active work, with attention to pressure support and neurologic surveillance after the incision is closed.

Pulmonary and revisional risk should shape exposure before the patient enters the room. Contemporary open thoracoabdominal repair cohorts emphasize the need for preoperative pulmonary risk stratification to inform thoracic incision choice, lung-protective ventilation, and extubation planning, while prior thoracotomy can increase adhesions, transfusion needs, and operative time during later open thoracoabdominal exposure.

For carotid exposure, the exposure plan should integrate neurologic monitoring and shunt strategy rather than treating shunting as an afterthought. Evidence comparing routine shunting, no shunting, selective shunting, and different selective monitoring methods remains low quality, so the practical standard is to make the shunt plan explicit: define the monitoring method, maintain a clean endarterectomy endpoint, and be ready to shunt promptly when the chosen clinical or monitoring trigger is met.

For limb exposure, the same frame applies: identify inflow, outflow, conduit, tunnel, and bailout before incision. In chronic limb-threatening ischemia, guidelines favor autologous vein for infrainguinal bypass and advise against non-autologous conduit unless no adequate vein is available and endovascular options are not possible; this makes conduit mapping and target planning part of exposure planning, not a separate preoperative chore.

Closure, patch, and conduit choices

Closure strategy is a reconstruction decision. In carotid endarterectomy, randomized-trial evidence summarized in systematic review shows that patch angioplasty reduces perioperative ipsilateral stroke and long-term restenosis greater than 50% compared with primary closure, so patch closure should be the default unless anatomy, infection risk, or other operative constraints justify another choice.

Patch material should be selected for the patient and wound, not for ideology. Comparative review of autologous vein, bovine pericardium, polytetrafluoroethylene, Dacron, and polyurethane did not show a significant difference in perioperative stroke, restenosis, or death between patch types, while narrative evaluation of patch selection emphasizes matching the material to handling, infection concern, diameter, bleeding, and availability.

Completion assessment should be routine in mindset even when selective in execution. A systematic review of intraoperative completion duplex ultrasound in carotid endarterectomy and lower-extremity bypass found that technical defects detected but left uncorrected were associated with worse outcomes, including carotid restenosis and bypass graft failure. The practical lesson is direct: if a completion study shows a correctable flap, stenosis, kink, poor endpoint, or flow-limiting lesion, the safest time to revise it is before leaving the operating room.

Guideline comparison

Systematic review of intraoperative completion Duplex ultrasound in carotid endarterectomy and lower extremity bypass (2021)

Supporting Study2 positions
  1. Systematic review of randomized trials of carotid endarterectomy closure shows that patch angioplasty reduces the perioperative risk of ipsilateral stroke and the long-term risk of restenosis greater than 50% compared with primary closure; routine patch closure after longitudinal arteriotomy in carotid endarterectomy is supported by pooled trial evidence.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing carotid endarterectomy with longitudinal arteriotomy.
    Boundary
    Evidence is derived from older trials; eversion technique is an alternative that avoids a patching step.
  2. Systematic review comparing different carotid patch materials — autologous vein, bovine pericardium, polytetrafluoroethylene, Dacron, and polyurethane — finds no significant difference in perioperative stroke, restenosis, or death between patch types; material choice may be guided by surgeon preference, field conditions, and local availability.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty.
    Boundary
    Risk of patch infection is low but finite with synthetic materials; biologic patches are generally preferred when infection risk is elevated.
  1. A 2021 systematic review of 22 studies on intraoperative completion Duplex ultrasound — 16 in carotid endarterectomy and 6 in lower extremity bypass — found that detected but uncorrected technical defects were associated with worse outcomes (CEA restenosis rates of 2.1 to 20 percent and lower-extremity-bypass thrombosis or reintervention rates up to roughly 36 percent within three months), and a large observational analysis (Knappich; 142,074 carotid endarterectomies) showed a modest adjusted reduction in stroke or mortality with selective intraoperative Duplex use (RR 0.74, 95 percent CI 0.63–0.88, p = 0.001); the review concluded that evidence remained heterogeneous and explicitly called for prospective trials to define the best scanning strategy and intervention criteria.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing carotid endarterectomy or open lower extremity bypass.
    Boundary
    Velocity thresholds and B-mode criteria for revision were surgeon-discretionary in most included studies; the largest signal of benefit is observational and applies to selective rather than routine IODUS; one large series (Wallaert) reported higher stroke/mortality in patients who received completion imaging, illustrating residual confounding by indication.
SVS/ESVS/WFVS Global Vascular Guidelines On Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia · 2019
  1. The 2019 SVS/ESVS/WFVS Global Vascular Guidelines for chronic limb-threatening ischemia recommend autologous vein as the preferred conduit for infrainguinal bypass (Recommendation 6.40, Grade 1, Moderate Quality B) and advise against non-autologous conduit unless no endovascular option and no adequate autologous vein exist (Recommendation 6.41, Grade 2, Low Quality C), within an integrated PLAN framework that bases the choice between endovascular intervention and open surgical bypass on Patient risk, Limb threat severity (WIfI), and Anatomic complexity (GLASS) plus availability of autologous vein (Recommendation 6.32, Grade 1, Low Quality C).
    Applies to
    Adults with chronic limb-threatening ischemia eligible for revascularization.
    Boundary
    WIfI is endorsed for limb-threat staging and GLASS is introduced for anatomic complexity scoring; specific GVG recommendation grades carry their own evidence-quality labels and should be interpreted within the document's full PLAN framework rather than as isolated rules.
    Strength
    GVG Grade 1 Moderate B; Grade 2 Low C; Grade 1 Low C
Cohort Study Of Left Carotid-Subclavian Bypass Durability During Zone 2 TEVAR
  1. In a 61-patient cohort, left carotid-subclavian bypass during Zone 2 TEVAR achieved 100% graft patency at 12 months with rare occlusions in the 12-to-24-month interval and acceptable perioperative morbidity, supporting routine use of synthetic CSB grafts when LSA revascularization is required.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing Zone 2 TEVAR requiring left subclavian artery revascularization with carotid-subclavian bypass.
    Boundary
    Based on a 61-patient cohort with patency reported to 12-24 months, so longer-term durability is not established.
Source · · · ·

For infrainguinal reconstruction, conduit choice often determines durability. Global vascular guidelines recommend autologous vein as the preferred conduit for infrainguinal bypass in chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and randomized-trial meta-analysis in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass found better primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency with saphenous vein than prosthetic conduit. Large contemporary femoropopliteal bypass data also associate vein conduit with better survival, lower thrombosis and infection rates, and lower amputation rates than prosthetic bypass.

When ideal vein is unavailable, the reconstruction must be honest about tradeoffs. Cryopreserved vein and extra-anatomic femoro-tibial bypass may be used as salvage strategies in selected chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients, but they require close patency surveillance and realistic expectations. In a multicenter cohort after lower-extremity cryopreserved vein bypass, therapeutic anticoagulation did not improve patency or limb salvage, whereas antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or P2Y12 inhibition was associated with better patency outcomes.

Visceral and arch-branch reconstructions demand the same conduit discipline. Single-stem visceral debranching from the infrarenal aorta to renal, mesenteric, and celiac targets achieved high target-vessel patency in a small complex-aortic cohort but carried substantial perioperative morbidity, while carotid-subclavian bypass for Zone 2 thoracic endovascular repair has shown strong 12-month graft patency in cohort data. These operations should be planned with a defined inflow, target sequence, graft route, and bailout for renal, mesenteric, or upper-extremity malperfusion.

Aortic, bypass, and groin exposure risk

Aortic exposure risk is dominated by clamp physiology, ischemic territory, bleeding control, and the consequences of prior repair. Foundational thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair principles include classifying aneurysm extent and planning visceral-vessel reimplantation around the segment of aorta being replaced; contemporary practice adds the need to anticipate renal, mesenteric, spinal cord, and pulmonary protection before proximal control is established.

Spinal cord protection is a defining example of exposure-linked reconstruction planning. In a 145-patient randomized trial of Crawford extent I or II thoracoabdominal repair, perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage targeting low cerebrospinal fluid pressure reduced neurologic deficit, and a large observational descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal repair series reported neurologic-deficit incidence while evaluating cerebrospinal fluid drainage as part of adjunctive protection. The practical implication is that spinal cord protection should be assigned, monitored, and continued after repair rather than delegated vaguely.

Guideline comparison

Crawford, foundational paper on thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysms involving the visceral arteries (1974)

  1. PMC open-access full text of the Crawford 1974 foundational paper on thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysms involving visceral arteries, covering Crawford TAAA classification and visceral-vessel reimplantation logic that remain the canonical anatomic frame for open exposure planning.
    Applies to
    Thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysms involving the visceral arteries, including Crawford classification and visceral-vessel reimplantation for open repair.
    Boundary
    A foundational anatomic classification rather than outcome evidence; consult the original description for the exact type definitions used in exposure planning.
Coselli . Randomized Trial Of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage For Spinal Cord Protection In Extent I/II Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair · 2002
  1. In a randomized clinical trial of 145 patients undergoing Crawford extent I or II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (76 cerebrospinal fluid drainage, 69 control) reported by Coselli and colleagues, perioperative CSF drainage targeting a CSF pressure of 10 mmHg or less and continued for 48 hours postoperatively was associated with a paraplegia or paraparesis rate of 2.6 percent versus 13.0 percent in controls (p = 0.03), an 80 percent relative risk reduction; thirty-day mortality was 5.3 percent with CSF drainage versus 2.9 percent in controls and not statistically different (p = 0.68).
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing open repair of Crawford extent I or II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Boundary
    Trial population was confined to Crawford extent I/II TAAA at a high-volume center; both arms received moderate heparinization, mild permissive hypothermia, left-heart bypass, and reattachment of critical intercostal arteries, so the trial estimates the marginal effect of CSF drainage on top of an established adjunct package rather than the effect of CSF drainage alone.
Coselli Review Of Multimodal Spinal Cord Protection During Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
  1. Multimodal spinal cord protection during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair combines cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, mild hypothermia, selective intercostal reattachment, and tight blood pressure management; postoperative protection extends those measures with perfusion-pressure maintenance, adequate hemoglobin, and early recognition of delayed paraplegia.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair where spinal cord protection planning is required.
    Boundary
    Applies to multimodal spinal cord protection during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair and may not generalize to other repair settings.
Supporting Study
  1. Systematic review of 6,374 femoropopliteal bypasses in 6,007 patients reports an overall 30-day morbidity rate of 36.8%, with wound infection in 7.8% of cases and graft infection in 2.4%; these rates quantify the wound and infectious risk that must be factored into patient selection and groin or thigh exposure planning for bypass surgery.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing femoropopliteal bypass surgery.
    Boundary
    Morbidity rates vary across series; patient factors including obesity, diabetes, and prior groin surgery increase wound complication risk.
Multi-Institutional Cohort On Evar-To-Open Conversion For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Journal Of Vascular Surgery
  1. JVS multi-institutional cohort on EVAR-to-open AAA conversion provides an open-conversion outcomes reference point not summarized here.
    Applies to
    Open surgical conversion of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair after failed prior endovascular repair, including re-do and complex aortic anatomy.
    Boundary
    Multi-institutional observational cohort data; association does not establish causation.
Source · · · ·

Selective intercostal and Adamkiewicz-artery strategies should be planned but not overpromised. Preoperative identification and selective reconstruction of the Adamkiewicz artery during open thoracoabdominal repair is feasible, yet more than half of reconstructed intercostal grafts occluded postoperatively in cohort data while overall paraplegia rates remained low. Surgeons should therefore treat intercostal reconstruction as one component of a broader spinal cord strategy, not as a guarantee of protection.

Renal and visceral protection should be incorporated into the exposure sequence. During open juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal repair, clamp position, renal ischemia time, perfusion adjuncts, and reimplantation sequence determine the margin for error. A pilot renal-perfusion strategy study in open juxtarenal aneurysm repair reports ischemia time, urine output, and early creatinine kinetics, supporting the practical habit of measuring renal exposure risk in minutes, perfusion quality, and postoperative renal trajectory.

Groin and lower-extremity bypass exposure carries a substantial wound burden. A systematic review of femoropopliteal bypass found a 30-day morbidity rate of 36.8%, wound infection in 7.8%, and graft infection in 2.4%, which should be part of consent, incision planning, conduit routing, and postoperative surveillance. The groin incision should be designed to protect lymphatics, avoid skin-edge ischemia, preserve bailout inflow options, and keep prosthetic material away from compromised soft tissue when possible.

Redo and post-endovascular open fields require a bailout-first mindset. Prior endovascular intervention before bypass did not significantly change 30-day mortality or amputation rates in meta-analysis, but prior devices, scarring, target loss, and altered inflow can still complicate exposure and reconstruction. Open conversion after EVAR and descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal replacement after thoracic endograft explantation should be approached with proximal control, device-removal strategy, blood-management planning, and end-organ ischemia planning already settled.

Clinical integration, follow-up, and evidence boundaries

Clinical integration means choosing open reconstruction when its exposure risk is justified by durability, urgency, anatomy, and patient goals. For symptomatic carotid stenosis, long-term follow-up and systematic reviews confirm that carotid endarterectomy within two weeks of the qualifying event reduces five-year ipsilateral stroke in patients with 70% to 99% stenosis and provides benefit in selected patients with 50% to 69% stenosis, while contemporary European guidelines define patient-specific criteria and timing for carotid endarterectomy versus stenting after ischemic events.

Guideline comparison

Postoperative surveillance after carotid, lower-extremity, and aortic reconstruction

Supporting Study3 positions
  1. Long-term follow-up and systematic reviews of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis confirm that surgery within two weeks of the qualifying event reduces ipsilateral stroke at five years in patients with 70 to 99 percent stenosis and provides smaller but meaningful benefit in selected patients with 50 to 69 percent stenosis, with perioperative stroke or death rates that must remain below pre-specified audit thresholds.
    Applies to
    Adults with recently symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis fit for surgery.
    Boundary
    Benefit is sex-, age-, and plaque-feature dependent; institutional perioperative stroke/death audit must be tracked.
  2. The 2023 ESVS clinical practice guidelines on atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease define patient-specific risk criteria for carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting, address the timing of carotid intervention after acute ischemic events, and provide updated guidance on managing patients on anticoagulation; these guidelines inform exposure planning, patient selection, and perioperative management for open carotid surgery.
    Applies to
    Adults with atherosclerotic carotid or vertebral artery disease being evaluated for intervention.
    Boundary
    Guideline recommendations are graded by evidence quality; individual patient risk factors and institutional experience should inform application.
  3. Meta-analysis of 48,297 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy finds that routine drain placement does not significantly reduce neck hematoma development and is associated with higher re-exploration rates compared with no drain; selective rather than routine postoperative drainage is recommended following carotid endarterectomy.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
    Boundary
    Drain placement may create false reassurance about wound bleeding; airway-threatening hematoma requires early clinical recognition regardless of drain status.
Two-Center Cross-Sectional Cohort Of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass For Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
  1. Contemporary two-center cross-sectional cohort of infrainguinal vein bypass for chronic limb-threatening ischemia reports patency, limb-salvage, and reintervention rates that contextualize open lower-extremity reconstruction outcomes in the BEST-CLI era.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing infrainguinal vein bypass for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
    Boundary
    A two-center cross-sectional cohort; reported rates provide context but do not establish causation and may not generalize.
Single-Institution Analysis Of Shifting Patient Demographics And Comorbidity Profiles For Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair In The Endovascular Era
  1. Single-institution analysis characterizes how patient demographics and comorbidity profiles for open TAAA repair have shifted in the endovascular era, informing case-selection and risk-adjusted benchmarking expectations for contemporary open reconstruction practice.
    Applies to
    Adults undergoing contemporary open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, with case selection and benchmarking shaped by demographics and comorbidity.
    Boundary
    A single-institution analysis; observed practice shifts may not generalize to other centers.
Source · · · ·

Open and endovascular choices should be framed as competing strategies with different failure modes. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting supports head-to-head decision-making for stroke prevention, while anesthesia evidence for carotid endarterectomy shows no significant perioperative stroke-or-death difference between general and local anesthesia; local anesthesia may still be useful when continuous awake neurologic monitoring will influence selective shunting.

Postoperative surveillance should be tied to the reconstruction performed. After carotid endarterectomy, the surgeon should monitor for neurologic change, neck hematoma, cranial nerve dysfunction, restenosis, and patch-related problems; routine drain placement does not significantly reduce neck hematoma and is associated with higher re-exploration rates compared with no drain, supporting selective rather than routine drain use.

After lower-extremity bypass, follow-up should focus on wound healing, graft patency, antithrombotic adherence, target-vessel runoff, and limb-salvage progress. Contemporary infrainguinal vein bypass data in chronic limb-threatening ischemia report patency, limb-salvage, and reintervention outcomes that contextualize expectations in the BEST-CLI era, and BEST-CLI subgroup evidence supports the durability advantage of single-segment saphenous vein bypass over endovascular therapy in appropriate chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients.

Aortic follow-up should include organ-system recovery, not only imaging. Contemporary open thoracoabdominal repair patients differ from historical cohorts in demographics and comorbidity profiles, which affects benchmarking, case selection, and postoperative expectations. Surveillance should therefore track spinal cord status, renal function, pulmonary recovery, graft integrity, branch patency, and the consequences of revisional exposure when prior endografts or prior thoracic incisions were present.

Evidence boundaries matter at the bedside. Some adjuncts are supported by randomized trials or guideline recommendations, such as cerebrospinal fluid drainage in extent I or II thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair and autologous vein preference for infrainguinal bypass in chronic limb-threatening ischemia; other areas depend on observational cohorts, technical evaluations, or lower-quality comparative evidence. A practical operative note and handoff should therefore state what was chosen, why it was chosen, what could fail, and how failure will be detected early.

References

  1. 1.
    Spinal cord protection in descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair. (1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00397-5
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort1999
    PubMedDOI
  2. 2.
    Cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results of a randomized clinical trial. (2002) DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.122024
    PubMed-indexed articleRandomized controlled trial2002
    PubMedDOI
  3. 3.
    Global Vascular Guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. (2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2019
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  4. 4.
    Applications of intraoperative Duplex ultrasound in vascular surgery: a systematic review. (2021) DOI: 10.1186/s13089-021-00208-8
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2021
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  5. 5.
    Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). (2022) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000190.pub4
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022
    PubMedDOI
  6. 6.
    2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001251
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2024
    PubMedDOI
  7. 7.
    Thoraco-abdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysms involving renal, superior mesenteric, celiac arteries. Ann Surg. 1974.
    PubMed-indexed article1974

    Thoraco-abdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysms involving renal, superior mesenteric, celiac arteries. Ann Surg. 1974. doi:10.1097/00000658-197405000-00032. PMID:4274686.

    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  8. 8.
    Conversion from endovascular to open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016.
    PubMed-indexed article2016

    Conversion from endovascular to open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.055.

    PubMedDOI
  9. 9.
    Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2016.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2016

    Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2016. doi:10.1186/s13019-016-0532-x.

    PubMedDOI
  10. 10.
    Selection criteria for patch angioplasty material in carotid endarterectomy. Surgical neurology international. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed article2022

    Selection criteria for patch angioplasty material in carotid endarterectomy. Surgical neurology international. 2022. doi:10.25259/sni_470_2022.

    PubMedDOI
  11. 11.
    Single Stem Visceral Debranching for Complex Aortic Disease DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.01.015
    PubMed-indexed article2022
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  12. 12.
    Impact of Reconstructing Intercostal Artery on Spinal Cord Circulation During Open Surgery for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0219
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2021
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  13. 13.
    Mid-Term Results of Left Carotid-Subclavian Bypass in Patients Undergoing Zone 2 TEVAR DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0597
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2021
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  14. 14.
    Investigation of center-specific saphenous vein utilization rates in femoral popliteal artery bypass DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.123
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2023
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  15. 15.
    Current approaches to spinal cord protection during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair DOI: 10.21037/acs-2023-scp-10
    PubMed-indexed articleReview2023
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  16. 16.
    Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study of Carotid-Subclavian Bypass versus In Situ Fenestration for Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization during Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175043
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2024
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  17. 17.
    Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716
    PubMed-indexed articleRandomized controlled trial2025
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  18. 18.
    Anticoagulation does not improve limb outcomes after lower extremity cryopreserved vein bypass DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.001
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2025
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  19. 19.
    Long-Term Outcomes of Extra-Anatomic Femoro-Tibial Bypass Reconstructions in Chronic Limb-Threating Ischemia DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051237
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2022
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  20. 20.
    Contemporary Outcomes of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Surgery for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia: A Two-Centre Cross-Sectional Study DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175343
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2024
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  21. 21.
    Shift in Patient Demographics of Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Patients in the Endovascular Era DOI: 10.3390/jcm14197088
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2025
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  22. 22.
    Advanced perfusion strategy for renal protection in juxtarenal aortic aneurysms: a pilot study DOI: 10.1186/s12872-026-05549-7
    PubMed-indexed article2026
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  23. 23.
    Impact of Previous Thoracotomy on Outcomes of Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis DOI: 10.3390/jcm15030963
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2026
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  24. 24.
    Pulmonary Risk Stratification in Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair DOI: 10.3390/jcm15072623
    PubMed-indexed article2026
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  25. 25.
    The impact of thoracic aortic endograft explant on open descending and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2026.101587
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2026
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  26. 26.
    Morbidity of femoropopliteal bypass surgery. Seminars in vascular surgery. 2015.
    PubMed-indexed articleReview2015

    Morbidity of femoropopliteal bypass surgery. Seminars in vascular surgery. 2015. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2015.09.004.

    PubMedDOI
  27. 27.
    Editor's Choice - Infrainguinal Bypass Following Failed Endovascular Intervention Compared With Primary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2019.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2019

    Editor's Choice - Infrainguinal Bypass Following Failed Endovascular Intervention Compared With Primary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.025.

    PubMedDOI
  28. 28.
    Vein Versus Prosthetic Graft for Femoropopliteal Bypass Above the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Angiology. 2019.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2019

    Vein Versus Prosthetic Graft for Femoropopliteal Bypass Above the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Angiology. 2019. doi:10.1177/0003319719826460.

    PubMedDOI
  29. 29.
    General Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. 2020.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2020

    General Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. 2020. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.029.

    PubMedDOI
  30. 30.
    Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2020

    Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001081.pub4.

    PubMedDOI
  31. 31.
    Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2021

    Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000071.pub4.

    PubMedDOI
  32. 32.
    To drain or not to drain following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2021

    To drain or not to drain following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2021. doi:10.23736/s0021-9509.21.11767-7.

    PubMedDOI
  33. 33.
    Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2021

    Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010373.pub3.

    PubMedDOI
  34. 34.
    Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2023

    Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011.

    PubMedDOI
  35. 35.
    Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022

    Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2022. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000160.pub4.

    PubMedDOI

Educational use only

AI assists this editorial workflow. Published updates are human-reviewed before publication.

Not intended to diagnose, monitor, predict, prognose, treat, or alleviate disease.

Verify clinically relevant information against primary sources and current guidelines.

AI DisclosurePrivacyTermsCautions