Perioperative Risk, Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Readmissions
Perioperative risk, anesthesia choice, critical-care planning, and readmission prevention in major vascular surgery. The chapter frames cardiac, pulmonary, renal, bleeding, and functional risk as inputs that can change the operative plan rather than as boxes to clear before incision.
Consult corner: A bedside consult-style discussion focused on what the clinician should decide next and what not to overinterpret.
Choose the hostsGuidance frame and preoperative risk inputs
Perioperative planning in vascular surgery is not “clearance”; it is a structured estimate of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, bleeding, functional, and recovery risk that should change the operative plan when risk is modifiable and sharpen consent when it is not. Major vascular operations should generally be treated as elevated-risk procedures, so the default for elective open aortic repair, infrainguinal bypass, and complex revascularization is formal risk stratification rather than a perfunctory preoperative note. Contemporary AHA/ACC guidance supports a stepwise approach using validated clinical indices, functional capacity expressed in metabolic equivalents, and selective biomarkers or stress imaging when the result would change management.
- Use the ERAS/SVS open aortic consensus statement as the vascular-specific enhanced-recovery framework for major open aortic operations: coordinate prehabilitation, regional anesthesia, temperature and fluid management, multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early oral intake and mobilization, and structured drain and tube removal across the four perioperative phases.
- Trigger
- Adults undergoing open transabdominal or retroperitoneal aortic surgery for aneurysmal or aortoiliac occlusive disease, including supraceliac, suprarenal, and infrarenal clamp sites.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Many recommendations carry moderate to weak certainty of evidence given the limited number of high-quality trials in major open aortic populations; the framework is intended as a coordinated pathway, with individual recommendations to be locally adapted.
Citation - Use the ERAS/SVS lower-extremity bypass consensus framework as the vascular-bypass-specific perioperative pathway: align prehabilitation, opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, structured nutrition, early mobilization, and discharge planning across the preadmission, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care.
- Trigger
- Adults undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Most recommendations carry moderate to weak certainty of evidence because high-quality trials in lower-extremity bypass populations are limited; the framework is intended to coordinate care rather than replace center-specific protocols.
Citation
The Revised Cardiac Risk Index remains a useful bedside checklist because its six variables map to common vascular patients: high-risk surgery, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, insulin-treated diabetes, and creatinine above 2.0 mg/dL. Its limitations are equally important: it was derived before modern high-sensitivity troponin and natriuretic peptide strategies, and it should not be the sole risk language for a frail patient with poor reserve or a complex vascular reconstruction. Vascular-specific models occupy the same clinical space but may better reflect the risk profile of carotid endarterectomy, lower-extremity bypass, EVAR, and open AAA repair.
Functional capacity should be elicited deliberately because vague statements such as “active for age” are often misleading. The practical question is whether the patient can perform meaningful exertion without angina, dyspnea, presyncope, or exhaustion, and whether the history is reliable enough to guide testing. ESC guidance similarly emphasizes metabolic-equivalent assessment, clinical risk scoring, and targeted use of natriuretic peptides or stress imaging in patients with poor functional capacity and elevated clinical risk before high-risk elective surgery. Contemporary cohort evidence comparing subjective capacity, Duke Activity Status Index, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and NT-proBNP supports treating functional capacity as a measured risk input rather than a casual impression.
Choice of anesthetic technique should be patient- and procedure-specific rather than ideological. In carotid endarterectomy, the GALA randomized trial found similar 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death rates with general and local anesthesia, supporting operational equipoise when the team is experienced with both approaches. The practical conclusion is that carotid anesthesia should be selected around airway risk, contralateral occlusion or monitoring concerns, patient cooperation, surgeon and anesthetist expertise, and the center’s ability to rescue hemodynamic or neurologic deterioration.
- Apply the stepwise AHA/ACC framework: classify the surgical risk tier, estimate functional capacity in metabolic equivalents, apply the RCRI or equivalent validated score, and determine whether further cardiac testing or cardiology consultation would change management before proceeding with the planned surgery.
- Trigger
- Adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery who require preoperative cardiac risk assessment.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Vascular operations are classified as elevated-risk; for most patients scheduled for major vascular surgery the default is formal risk stratification rather than empiric clearance.
Citation - Use the RCRI as a bedside cardiac risk screening tool: a score of 0 or 1 predicts low risk, 2 intermediate risk, and 3 or more elevated risk warranting discussion of the need for further cardiac evaluation before elective noncardiac surgery.
- Trigger
- Adults undergoing elective major noncardiac surgery requiring preoperative cardiac risk stratification.
- Branch / Endpoint
- The RCRI was derived before high-sensitivity troponin and natriuretic peptide testing; contemporary guidelines recommend considering biomarkers in addition to the RCRI when functional capacity is uncertain or when the index predicts intermediate to high risk.
Citation - In patients with known or suspected cardiac disease scheduled for elevated-risk noncardiac surgery, apply the ESC stepwise algorithm: estimate functional capacity, compute a validated clinical risk score, and consider preoperative biomarker testing or stress imaging when results would change the management decision.
- Trigger
- Adults with known or suspected cardiovascular disease scheduled for noncardiac surgery, particularly high-risk or intermediate-risk elective procedures.
- Branch / Endpoint
- The ESC and AHA/ACC frameworks are broadly concordant but differ in specific thresholds for natriuretic peptide testing and stress imaging indications; apply the guideline current in the applicable institution and jurisdiction.
Citation
Enhanced-recovery pathways provide the organizational frame once the operation is selected. For open aortic surgery, vascular-specific ERAS recommendations span preadmission screening and prehabilitation, carbohydrate loading, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, anesthetic and epidural protocols, temperature management, multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early oral intake and mobilization, and structured fluid and drain management. For infrainguinal bypass, ERAS guidance similarly emphasizes prehabilitation, nutrition, multimodal analgesia, mobilization, and discharge planning. These pathways should be adapted locally, because much of the vascular evidence remains moderate or weak rather than trial-definitive.
- Use the GALA equipoise as the default counseling for carotid endarterectomy: anesthetic mode does not by itself change the 30-day stroke, MI, or death risk; let surgeon, anesthetist, and patient choose local versus general anesthesia based on airway, neurologic monitoring, and patient preference rather than expected outcome difference.
- Trigger
- Adults with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to carotid endarterectomy under general versus local anesthesia in the GALA trial.
- Branch / Endpoint
- GALA enrolled patients between 1999 and 2007 and predates routine high-sensitivity troponin and contemporary neuromonitoring practice; subgroup signals (for example contralateral occlusion) and operator experience may still favor one mode for specific patients.
Citation
Frailty and medication decisions
Frailty should be assessed before elective vascular intervention because it predicts outcomes that conventional cardiac indices do not capture well: complications, prolonged length of stay, readmission, mortality, loss of independence, and the need for more intensive discharge planning. In older surgical patients, validated frailty instruments consistently identify patients at higher postoperative risk even when chronological age and operation type appear similar. Frailty should not be used as a single yes-or-no gate; it should trigger a different conversation about goals, alternatives, prehabilitation, postoperative destination, and the likely burden of recovery.
- Screen for frailty in older patients before elective vascular surgery using a validated instrument; document the frailty assessment in the perioperative plan, use it to inform shared decision-making about risk and goals, and communicate the finding to the anesthesia and postoperative care teams.
- Trigger
- Older adults (typically aged 65 or older) scheduled for elective major surgery including vascular procedures.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Effect sizes vary across frailty instruments and surgical populations; frailty should be incorporated into risk stratification as one of several inputs rather than used as a single binary gate for operative eligibility.
Citation - Use a positive frailty signal to intensify shared decision-making, prehabilitation planning, discharge support, and postoperative surveillance rather than as a single binary operative gate.
- Trigger
- Patients undergoing open or endovascular arterial reconstruction with a frailty assessment available during procedure planning.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Registry association supports risk stratification; frailty instrument choice and local resources determine how the finding changes the pathway.
Citation - Compare frailty-instrument results with patient goals, expected functional recovery, and alternatives before finalizing an elective vascular procedure plan.
- Trigger
- Frail patients being considered for elective aortic or lower-extremity revascularization.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Evidence is heterogeneous across frailty tools; use it to structure shared decisions, not to promise individual outcome prediction.
Citation
Frailty is especially relevant in vascular surgery because the “successful” technical endpoint may not equal a successful patient-centered outcome. Vascular registry work supports structured frailty assessment at the time of procedure planning for both open and endovascular arterial reconstruction, with frailty independently associated with postdischarge mortality. Decision-making reviews in frail vascular patients emphasize that elective aortic and lower-extremity revascularization require shared decision-making when standard risk tools underestimate functional decline, institutionalization, or late mortality.
Perioperative beta-blockade is a continuation decision more often than an initiation decision. Established beta-blocker therapy should generally be continued, but starting a new beta-blocker solely because a vascular operation is planned is not supported as a routine maneuver. The POISE trial showed fewer myocardial infarctions with high-dose extended-release metoprolol begun shortly before surgery, but this benefit came with more stroke and higher total mortality. Systematic review evidence similarly supports caution: potential reductions in myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation must be weighed against bradycardia and hypotension.
ACE inhibitors and ARBs require individualized handling, particularly in patients vulnerable to vasoplegia, renal hypoperfusion, or difficult clamp-related hemodynamics. A randomized comparison of continuing versus withholding renin-angiotensin system inhibitors before major noncardiac surgery found less intraoperative hypotension when the drug was withheld without more major postoperative cardiovascular or kidney events, supporting a selective hold in hypotension-prone patients. A separate randomized trial found no statistically significant difference in a composite of intraoperative hypotension or postoperative cardiovascular events between discontinuation and continuation, so the decision should consider the indication for the drug, heart-failure stability, refractory hypertension, and the expected hemodynamic profile of the operation.
Antithrombotic management should match the drug, renal function, bleeding risk of the procedure, and thromboembolic indication. For direct oral anticoagulants, a prospective standardized perioperative protocol based on DOAC pharmacokinetics, procedural bleeding risk, and creatinine clearance—without routine heparin bridging or coagulation-function testing—achieved low 30-day major-bleeding and arterial-thromboembolism rates in atrial-fibrillation patients. Consensus synthesis likewise distinguishes warfarin from DOAC interruption schedules and emphasizes that routine bridging has a limited role in many procedural strata.
Hemodynamics, critical care, and postoperative outcome tracking
Intraoperative hypotension is not a single number; it is a duration, depth, and patient-reserve problem. Patients with chronic hypertension, renal dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease, or marginal coronary reserve may tolerate hypotension poorly even when the absolute mean arterial pressure appears acceptable. Evidence from major noncardiac surgery supports individualized MAP targets, continuous arterial pressure monitoring, vasopressor titration protocols, and goal-directed fluid therapy to reduce the incidence and cumulative duration of hypotension, with the target adapted to baseline pressure, end-organ reserve, and procedural physiology.
- Anticipate intraoperative hypotension in vascular patients with baseline hypertension, renal insufficiency, or planned aortic or iliac manipulation; agree on a target MAP range with anesthesia before the case and confirm that vasopressor protocols are available at induction.
- Trigger
- Adults having major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia who are at risk for intraoperative hypotension.
- Branch / Endpoint
- Evidence supports individualized MAP targets over a single universal floor; the optimal lower MAP limit varies with the patient's chronic pressure, end-organ reserve, and the procedure's hemodynamic profile.
Citation
Postoperative level of care should be selected deliberately rather than assigned by habit. A blanket ICU-for-all policy after vascular surgery is not consistently supported by trial evidence; triage should account for baseline risk, procedural complexity, intraoperative instability, blood loss, vasopressor requirement, respiratory status, renal reserve, and the capacity of the ward or step-down unit to detect early deterioration. Selective ICU triage is safest when the institution has explicit escalation pathways, reliable monitoring, and a unit capable of managing vascular-specific complications.
Troponin surveillance changes postoperative diagnosis because most perioperative myocardial injury is silent. In a large noncardiac-surgery cohort, high-sensitivity troponin T elevation after surgery was strongly graded with 30-day mortality, and most patients with myocardial injury had no ischemic symptoms. A separate cohort found troponin elevation above the 99th percentile in about 16% of adults aged 45 years or older after inpatient noncardiac surgery, with nearly 90% of MINS events asymptomatic and independently associated with increased 30-day mortality. The bedside implication is simple: absence of chest pain does not exclude clinically important myocardial injury after major vascular surgery.
- Clinical point
- In the VISION prospective cohort of 21,842 adults undergoing noncardiac surgery, peak postoperative high-sensitivity troponin T elevation was strongly graded with 30-day mortality: less than 5 ng/L served as the reference, peak hsTnT of 20-64 ng/L was associated with 3.0 percent 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 23.63 versus reference), 65-999 ng/L with 9.1 percent (HR 70.34), and at least 1000 ng/L with 29.6 percent (HR 227.01); among 3,904 patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (17.9 percent), 3,633 (93.1 percent) had no ischemic symptoms.
- Action
- Treat any postoperative hsTnT elevation in vascular surgery patients as an independent mortality signal even without chest pain; escalate workup and cardiology involvement for higher hsTnT bins, because the VISION cohort showed a steep graded relationship between peak hsTnT and 30-day death.
- Caveat
- Numerical thresholds are assay-specific to high-sensitivity troponin T as used in the VISION protocol; institutions using a different assay or upper reference limit must recalibrate the bins to the local 99th percentile before applying these mortality estimates.
CitationAdults aged 45 or older undergoing inpatient noncardiac surgery, particularly those with underlying cardiovascular disease.
- Clinical point
- A large cohort study of perioperative myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery found that cardiac troponin T elevation above the 99th percentile occurred in approximately 16 percent of adults aged 45 or older undergoing inpatient noncardiac surgery; nearly 90 percent of MINS events were asymptomatic and MINS was independently associated with substantially increased 30-day mortality.
- Action
- Recognize that MINS may present without chest pain or ischemic symptoms, particularly in older vascular surgery patients; a rising postoperative troponin without overt ischemia requires the same attention as a symptomatic event and should prompt cardiology involvement.
- Caveat
- Incidence estimates use high-sensitivity troponin T; institutions using different assays should apply the 99th percentile upper reference limit for that specific assay when applying the MINS definition.
CitationAdults with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery defined by elevated cardiac troponin above the 99th percentile within 30 days of surgery.
- Clinical point
- The MANAGE randomized controlled trial of dabigatran versus placebo in patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery found that dabigatran 110 mg twice daily significantly reduced the composite of major vascular complications at two years without a significant increase in major bleeding, providing the first randomized evidence that anticoagulation may reduce cardiovascular events in patients with MINS.
- Action
- In patients who develop MINS and have no contraindication to anticoagulation, consider anticoagulation therapy in discussion with cardiology; the MANAGE trial provides the strongest randomized evidence currently available for this indication.
- Caveat
- MANAGE enrolled patients at specialized centers; anticoagulation after MINS must be weighed against surgical bleeding risk, contraindications, and the patient's overall clinical trajectory.
Citation
For vascular patients, postoperative troponin elevation should trigger structured evaluation rather than reflexive dismissal as “demand.” Meta-analysis in vascular surgery found that postoperative troponin elevation predicted short-term mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and long-term mortality. Vascular cohort data further suggest that both ischemic and non-ischemic mechanisms matter prognostically, with ischemic mechanisms carrying the greatest excess late-mortality risk. Management should integrate bleeding risk, renal function, graft or wound status, ECG findings, symptoms, hemodynamics, and cardiology input when the result will alter treatment.
The treatment pathway after MINS is evolving. The MANAGE trial found that dabigatran 110 mg twice daily reduced major vascular complications at two years in patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery without a significant increase in major bleeding, but this does not mean every fresh vascular wound should be anticoagulated. The surgeon’s role is to define the bleeding hazard: fresh anastomosis, neuraxial catheter status, retroperitoneal or groin hematoma, renal function, need for reoperation, and competing antiplatelet requirements must be reconciled before adding anticoagulation.
Delirium, postoperative atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding should be tracked as vascular outcomes, not incidental medical events. An individual-patient-data meta-analysis across noncardiac surgery found postoperative delirium in roughly one in five patients, with older age, baseline cognitive impairment, elevated inflammatory markers, and prolonged anesthetic duration among the strongest predictors. A large international cohort found postoperative atrial fibrillation in about 1% of noncardiac-surgery patients without baseline atrial fibrillation, with NT-proBNP adding independent predictive information. Perioperative ischemic stroke in cardiac and vascular surgery populations carries elevated cardiovascular and neurologic cause-specific mortality, and pharmacologic bleeding-reduction strategies in vascular surgery may reduce transfusion requirements, although mortality evidence remains low-certainty.
Clinical integration, follow-up, and evidence boundaries
Readmission prevention begins before discharge, not after the patient reappears in the emergency department. In lower-extremity bypass, 30-day readmission is common: ACS-NSQIP data showed an 18% rate, and an institutional cohort showed a 14% rate. Wound infection accounted for a large share of readmission indications, and most readmissions were related and unplanned. Patients returning to the operating room during the index admission, those with cardiac comorbidity, critical-limb-ischemia indication, dialysis dependence, malnutrition, dependent functional status, obesity, or dyspnea require more deliberate discharge planning and earlier contact.
The discharge plan should be tailored to the failure modes of the operation. After lower-extremity bypass, groin wound infection, graft surveillance needs, edema, anticoagulant or antiplatelet transitions, pain control, and mobility limitations are predictable readmission drivers. After open AAA repair, approach-specific signals matter: registry data comparing transabdominal and retroperitoneal open AAA repair reported higher long-term reintervention and 30-day readmission after the transabdominal approach with comparable perioperative mortality, supporting more vigilant postoperative planning when the exposure or recovery burden is higher.
Early outpatient follow-up is a modifiable care process. Cohort evidence in general and vascular surgery found that earlier post-discharge outpatient follow-up was associated with lower 30-day readmission, and vascular readmission analyses suggest that a meaningful minority of readmissions may be avoidable through index-admission optimization, transitional-care escalation, or earlier clinic review. For high-risk bypass, open aortic, dialysis, frail, malnourished, or wound-compromised patients, follow-up should be treated as part of the operation’s risk-control plan rather than a routine scheduling task.
Fragmentation of care is itself a vascular risk. Complex aortic patients who travel farther from the index hospital have higher non-index readmission rates, which can hide the true readmission burden from a single-center quality dashboard. Before discharge, the team should identify who will evaluate fever, wound drainage, limb symptoms, anticoagulation questions, renal dysfunction, and pain; the patient should not be left to decide whether to call the index vascular team, a local hospital, or a primary-care clinician during the first unstable postoperative weeks.
- Action
- Schedule early outpatient follow-up for high-risk patients and define who reviews wounds, medications, renal function, anticoagulation, and warning symptoms.
- Clinical point
- A general and vascular surgery cohort analysis comparing post-discharge outpatient follow-up timing against 30-day readmission found that earlier outpatient follow-up was associated with lower readmission rates, supporting structured transitional-care visits as a readmission-mitigation lever.
- Caveat
- Observational timing evidence should be adapted to local access, telehealth capacity, and acuity of postoperative concerns.
Citation- Vascular-surgery patients at risk for potentially preventable 30-day readmission.
- Action
- Use index-admission optimization, discharge medication reconciliation, wound planning, and early escalation pathways to target avoidable readmission drivers.
- Clinical point
- A vascular-surgery cohort analysis of 30-day readmissions categorized causes as potentially preventable versus non-preventable and reported that a substantial minority of readmissions were judged avoidable through index-admission optimization, transitional-care escalation, or earlier outpatient follow-up.
- Caveat
- Preventability judgments are cohort- and reviewer-dependent; use them as a quality-improvement lens rather than a patient-level guarantee.
Citation
The evidence base should be used with humility. ERAS pathways for open aortic surgery and lower-extremity bypass organize care well, but many recommendations rest on moderate or weak certainty because vascular-specific randomized trials are limited. Troponin surveillance, ICU triage, frailty scoring, and readmission reduction all require local calibration: assay thresholds, ward capability, rehabilitation access, home support, and travel distance change how published estimates translate to a given patient. The senior trainee should learn to convert these data into explicit perioperative commitments: what risk is being measured, what will be changed because of the result, who owns the abnormal finding, and when the patient will be reassessed.
References
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. 1999.PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort1999
Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. 1999. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1043.
- 27.Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. 2008.PubMed-indexed articleRandomized controlled trial2008
Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. 2008. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60601-7.
- 28.Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC geriatrics. 2016.PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2016
Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC geriatrics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0329-8.
- 29.Perioperative Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: Incidence, Mortality, and Characterization. Circulation. 2018.PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2018
Perioperative Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: Incidence, Mortality, and Characterization. Circulation. 2018. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.030114.
- 30.Dabigatran in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MANAGE): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. 2018.PubMed-indexed articleRandomized controlled trial2018
Dabigatran in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MANAGE): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. 2018. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30832-8.
- 31.2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. 2022.PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2022
2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. 2022. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270.
- 32.Intraoperative Hypotension in Patients Having Major Noncardiac Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review of Blood Pressure Optimization Strategies. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2025.PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2025
Intraoperative Hypotension in Patients Having Major Noncardiac Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review of Blood Pressure Optimization Strategies. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2025. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000007074.
- 33.Continuation vs Discontinuation of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Before Major Noncardiac Surgery: The Stop-or-Not Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024.PubMed-indexed articleRandomized controlled trial2024
Continuation vs Discontinuation of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Before Major Noncardiac Surgery: The Stop-or-Not Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.17123.
- 34.2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery. 2024.PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2024
2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery. 2024. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001285.
- 35.
Educational use only
AI assists this editorial workflow. Published updates are human-reviewed before publication.
Not intended to diagnose, monitor, predict, prognose, treat, or alleviate disease.
Verify clinically relevant information against primary sources and current guidelines.