Applied

Type

Reinforcement

Confidence

80%

Created

Mar 27, 2026

Evidence

1 source

Rationale

The new article by Esposito et al. (2025) provides high-quality multicenter validation for the risk-stratified EVAR surveillance protocols already mentioned in the text. By specifically identifying 1-year sac shrinkage as a key predictor for long-term success, it strengthens the argument for de-escalating surveillance in stable patients. I integrated this finding into the final paragraph to reinforce the existing guidelines. I also expanded the abbreviation 'DUS' on its first occurrence as required.

Content Changes

Surveillance ensures early detection of complications such as graft stenosis, endoleaks, and restenosis.

* **endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR):** computed tomography angiography (CTA) or DUSduplex ultrasound (DUS) at 1 month, 12 months, then annually (ESVS, SVS) [@evar2019].
* **Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair:** Imaging only if symptomatic.
* **Bypass grafting:** DUS at 1–3, 6, 12 months, then annually [@almasri2018].
* **Carotid (carotid endarterectomy (CEA)/carotid artery stenting (CAS)):** DUS at 6 months, then every 1–2 years [@esvs2018-esvs].
* **Venous intervention:** DUS at 1–3 months, then as clinically indicated.

For EVAR, risk-stratified surveillance per ESVS AAA guidance suggests that many standard EVARs may transition to duplex-based annual follow-up after a stable first-year scan, while complex anatomies or endoleaks require individualized schedules [@wanhainen2019, @aburahma2019]. Recent multicenter data reinforces this approach, demonstrating that aneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year is a robust predictor of long-term stability, further justifying the implementation of reduced-intensity surveillance algorithms for low-risk patients [@esposito2025-esposito].