Hybrid Approaches

in Overview of Vascular Disease

Applied

Type

Addition

Confidence

50%

Created

Mar 27, 2026

Evidence

1 source

Rationale

The section was updated to include acute infrarenal aortic occlusion as an additional example of the utility of hybrid approaches, supported by recent literature Loh SA et al. Hybrid aorto-iliac reconstruction for acute infrarenal aortic occlusion: A case report. Vascular. 2024. PMID: 39142331.. Abbreviations were expanded per the instructions to ensure clarity for the reader. The existing table and structure were preserved.

Evidence

Loh SA et al. Hybrid aorto-iliac reconstruction for acute infrarenal aortic occlusion: A case report. Vascular. 2024. PMID: 39142331.
Verified source
PubMedDOI

Content Changes

CombineHybrid approaches combine open and endovascular methods, e.g.,such as iliac stenting +with femoral TEAthromboendarterectomy or(TEA), visceral debranching +with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), or reconstruction for acute infrarenal aortic occlusion, offering flexibility for complex anatomy [@bisdas2013].[@bisdas2013; @loh2024].

<!-- type: comparison -->
**Table 1.2. Comparison of Treatment Options**

| **Approach** | **Advantages** | **Disadvantages** |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Open** | Durable outcomes, proven long-term survival | Higher perioperative risk, longer recovery |
| **Endovascular** | Minimally invasive, lower perioperative risk | Requires surveillance, higher reintervention rates |
| **Hybrid** | Tailored to complex cases | Technically demanding, resource-intensive |
Go to section in textbookDispute / Submit evidenceAll updates